V4.1-Flash-1017 对比 GPT-5.6 Sol 与 Opus 5：多项跑分领先、价格低一个量级
列出 DeepSWE 77.0、Automation-Bench 60.5、Agents' Last Exam 35.4、Apex Bench 72.1 等厂商自测成绩，均高于 Sol 和 Opus 5，并对比每百万 token 价格：Flash 为 $0.15/$0.60 闲时，Sol 为 $4/$20，Opus 5
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 is seriously impressive. The new update beats GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 on several coding and agent benchmarks, at a fraction of their API prices. Key benchmark results: • DeepSWE: 77.0 vs 73.0 (Sol) and 74.0 (Opus 5). • Automation-Bench: 60.5 vs 45.8 (Sol) and 50.3 (Opus 5). • Agents' Last Exam: 35.4 vs 26.7 (Sol) and 28.6 (Opus 5). • Apex Bench: 72.1 vs 54.3 (Sol) and 65.8 (Opus 5). API pricing per 1M tokens (input/output): • DeepSeek Flash: $0.15 / $0.60 off-peak, $0.30 / $1.20 peak. • GPT-5.6 Sol: $4 / $20. • Claude Opus 5: $5 / $25. These are DeepSeek's reported benchmarks, and Opus 5 still leads in several other tests. DeepSeek also reports shorter outputs and faster task completion. Open weights under MIT. 1M-token context window. The price-performance gap is getting interesting.
这条是引用着另一条写的：x.com/openmodelsai/status/2111378754928787480