WHAT NEW IN X10.30 FRI

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 60,637 条

deepseek-v4.1IMAGE

V4.1 Flash 1017 对比:DeepSWE 77%,高于 Opus 5 的 74% 与 GPT 5.6 Sol

帖子引用官方数据称 V4.1 Flash 1017 在 DeepSWE 达 77%,输出价 $0.60–$1.20/百万 token,远低于闭源旗舰,并讨论开源经济学。

RC | Macro Sift
@themacrosift11 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.18
V4.1 Flash 1017 对比:DeepSWE 77%,高于 Opus 5 的 74% 与 GPT 5.6 Sol
RC | Macro Sift @themacrosift原推发布于 2026.10.18
在 X 上打开原推

OPEN SOURCE AI IS CLOSING THE GAP. AND THE ECONOMICS ARE GETTING HARDER TO IGNORE. DeepSeek just released V4.1 Flash 1017, an openly available, MIT licensed AI model that reportedly achieves 77% on the DeepSWE software engineering benchmark. For perspective, DeepSeek’s published comparison puts Claude Opus 5 at 74% and GPT 5.6 Sol at 73%. Now consider the economics. DeepSeek’s API costs just $0.60 to $1.20 per million output tokens, depending on usage hours. Some premium proprietary models charge tens of dollars for that same token volume. These are not identical models, and performance varies by task. But the direction of travel is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. I’m firmly in the open source camp, and not simply because of price. It’s about competition. Independence. Innovation. The ability for researchers, developers and businesses to build powerful systems without depending entirely on a handful of corporate gatekeepers. That doesn’t mean proprietary AI has no place. It absolutely does. Companies that deliver superior performance deserve to be compensated for it. But the burden of proving that premium value is increasing. My conviction is that AI will become exponentially more valuable as intelligence becomes more accessible, not more restricted. The companies that control today’s models may not be the companies that capture tomorrow’s greatest opportunities. And that’s precisely why open source AI matters. Source: DeepSeek official release and pricing documentation. Benchmark figures are company reported.

x.com/themacrosift/status/2111507843845361978采集于 2026.10.18 16:35