实测：DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 直连 API 比 OpenCode 免费通道更省 token
用户对比直连 DeepSeek API 与 OpenCode 免费通道：直连缓存命中 99.6%+ 更快更省，免费通道压缩从约 300K 开始，OpenCode Go 花 10 美元约得 80 美元推理量。
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 taught me something i didn’t expect: the same model can feel completely different depending on where you run it. 1/ direct API feels noticeably better than OpenCode free for me. the free route is slower and seems to make the model do more unnecessary work. 2/ cache quality matters more than i expected. in OpenCode i’m seeing around 98% cache hit, while direct DeepSeek can regularly push 99.6%+, and on long sessions even close to 99.95%. 3/ the free context workaround is basically dead. i used to be able to stretch sessions close to 1M tokens, but now compression starts around 300K. 4/ on OpenCode Go, the economics are still hard to beat: $10 gives roughly $80 worth of inference, so i can run DeepSeek for much longer sessions without thinking about every token. 5/ 1017 also feels more efficient than the previous checkpoint. the price is the same, but it loops less, so i’m spending fewer tokens to get to the same finished task. provider, cache and context setup matter way more than i expected.
这条是引用着另一条写的：「OpenCode 实测 V4.1 Flash 1017：循环更少、视觉可用」