Gemini 4 Pro / Flash: benchmarks, hands-on tests and leaks

A user shares a Google Antigravity usage panel for Gemini 4 Argon High showing 67% of the weekly limit still remaining with a reset in 7 minutes.

The same water-pump prompt went to Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon, GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.7, yielding four very different mechanical designs with no scoring, leaving readers to judge which actually works.

A user posts their first Gemini 4 Carbon result from Arena and says more tests will follow if the checkpoint keeps working.

A discussion post ranks Gemini 4 first, GPT-6 Astra second, Grok 4.7 third and Claude Opus 5.5 fourth, asking which one actually wins.

A demo pairs Gemini 4 Argon with Blender MCP to convert a single Nano Banana-generated Gothic cathedral image into a 3D scene, showing AI directly driving modeling tools.

Author ran six Japanese writing tasks across Gemini 3.8 thinking mode, 3.6 Flash and 4 Argon; only 3.8 hit exactly 200 characters, while Argon excelled at plain-language explanations for 70-year-olds.

A video argues GPT-6 and Gemini 4 Argon didn't simplify building; they made it harder for founders to decide which model fits which task.

A short video jokes that after Kimi K3.1 Pro, Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Haiku 5.5, the bug is still alive.

The post argues Opus 5.5, Kimi K3.1 Pro and the coming Gemini 4 Carbon could pressure OpenAI into releasing GPT-6 Bel.

A post highlights the pricing spread across Opus 5.5 at $20, Gemini 4 Argon at $10 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $1.20, asking which model people default to.

A Japanese user contrasts Gemini Argon's clever answer with Qwen3.8Max pointing out contradictions and DeepSeek Flash seeming rational but failure-prone, concluding the latter two are more usable.

The poster plans to write formal proofs with Gemini 4 Argon high and have GPT-6 Astra review them for serious flaws, testing its math and logic.