GPT-6 Astra in Practice: Tests, Use Cases, and Feedback

SenseTime studied Astra on embodied-AI tasks and released open-source 27B SenseNova-RoboRSI, claiming roughly 50x lower task costs.

OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra, claiming computer-use on par with GPT-6 Astra, tasks finished over 3x faster than Astra and Sol, API at $1/$5 per million tokens, limited to ChatGPT Work and Codex on Plus and above.

Polymarket reports OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra, claiming it completes professional computer tasks over 3x faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol at substantially lower cost.

The poster argues OpenAI should prioritize beating Opus 5.5 at any cost and wants a new, stronger Astra rather than another Terra release.

Per OpenAI, GPT-6.1 Terra matches Astra on its agent benchmark while seeing the screen, acting across apps and running faster, at one-tenth Astra's price.

OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra for computer use; it matches GPT-6 Astra on some desktop tasks while running faster and costing one-tenth per token.

The author links a buried release-note change swapping Plus/Pro defaults to GPT-6.1 Terra with Terra's $1/$5 API pricing and a cut to $200 Pro Codex allowance, arguing Terra exists to protect OpenAI's margin rather than beat Opus 5.5.

A video explains how Astra hit 99.9% under a special setup but only 62.7% on the standard ARC-AGI-3 test, plus Replit's OpenAI shift and agents hiding problems.

The author guesses OpenAI released cheaper Terra so the always-on Dots bot can move off its current GPT-6 Astra default and ease compute pressure.

Merge Gateway says GPT-6.1 Terra is now available, matching GPT-6 Astra at one-tenth the per-token price and finishing tasks over 3x faster than Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.

OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra, claiming Astra-level computer use at one-tenth the token price and over 3x the speed of Astra and Sol.

As OpenAI ships 6.1 Terra, a user notes Sonnet 5.5 beats not only Terra but also 6.1 and GPT-6 Astra on some benchmarks.