GPT-6 Sol leaks, screenshots and release rumors

Third-party API site ClawAPI published prices: GPT-6 Sol at $2/$10 per million tokens, Luna at $0.10/$0.50, and Opus 5.5 at $4/$20, with USDC payment supported.

A short review calls GPT-6 Sol a reliable workhorse for getting work done, but says using it is not fun.

A developer says Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol launching on the same day made frontier intelligence affordable, and that work once taking a team a month now takes one person an afternoon.

Users report that Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol have been suddenly emitting Chinese characters today, described as an anomaly near the end of a deployment.

A Chinese user complains that GPT-6 Sol costs half as much but feels like a quantized GPT-5.6 Sol, calls it as dumb as Grok 4.7, and demands a refund.

In a comparison thread, the user says Opus 5.5 is better but found GPT-6 Sol very strong after two days, and notes they are not sponsored.

A user complains that GPT-6 Sol lacks initiative and says there is no point staying in Codex if GPT-5.6 Sol is removed.

GPT-6 Sol scores 643 on BridgeBench, ahead of Fable 5 at 628, while costing one-fifth as much.

A Chinese user says GPT-6 Sol can't even fix basic website UI code without repeated back-and-forth and feels dumber than 5.6 Sol, recommending Astra Extra High for complex tasks.

A user reports GPT-6 Sol feels smaller and buggier, and that despite being 50% cheaper, Codex usage still drains fast, with some calling Terra the new Sol.

MathArena added GPT-6 Sol, which scores just behind GPT-6 Astra at a slightly lower cost, though longer reasoning brings its total cost closer to Astra's.

Developer banteg says a major regression in GPT-6 Sol is that it keeps making isolated clones of repos to avoid disturbing other work, seemingly unaware it can switch branches.