GPT-6 Sol leaks, screenshots and release rumors

The author breaks down an Axios report, noting seven anonymous sources, no stated whistleblower motive, and timing that coincides with the same-day releases of Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol/Luna.

A leak claims Sonnet 5.5 is in grey testing in Claude Code with some accounts already routed to it, beats GPT-6 Sol in most areas, keeps Sonnet 5 pricing, and may launch around OpenAI DevDay.

An unsourced leak says Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 arrive next week and that Sonnet 5.5 already outperforms GPT-6 Sol.

The poster says Anthropic just released a model that is better and cheaper than OpenAI's best, and OpenAI's rumored response is a $500/month ChatGPT Pro Max plan.

A user complains that OpenAI is launching a more expensive plan rather than making GPT-6 Sol as good as Opus 5.5, saying OpenAI models no longer make sense to use.

A spend-share breakdown shows Anthropic falling from 69% to 40% and OpenAI rising from 10% to 24%, with the growth attributed to GPT-6 Astra and GPT 5.6 Sol.

A short post predicts that using Opus 5.5 as the main controller with GPT-6 Sol running subagents will soon become the mainstream setup.

A video says OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol at half the price roughly 90 minutes after Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5, with early independent tests split on which is better.

The developer says they use Opus 5.5 as the main agent and sometimes stack it with GPT-6 Sol, and use Opus 5.5 plus GPT Astra for image tasks.

The author says tasks that take Claude Opus 5.5 over an hour are done by GPT-6 Astra in 15 minutes or less, so they often use Astra and Sol for time-sensitive work.

On the $200 plan, a full day of heavy Sol use took about 8% of the weekly limit, and the author says the two models work better together than as a contest.

The author gives an equivalence table for Opus 5.5 low, medium and high effort against GPT-6 Sol and Astra reasoning levels, concluding that switching effort is more common than switching models.