GPT-6 Sol leaks, screenshots and release rumors

A video post shows GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 being tested together on 3D tasks in Unreal Engine and Blender.

A hands-on comparison video has Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol each complete a Premiere Pro editing task to see which model handles real software better.

A comparison post says Sonnet 5.5 performs far better than GPT-6 Sol, and that only Astra 6.1 can save OpenAI from humiliation.

A poster says Opus 5.5 is cheaper and smarter than Astra, GPT-6 Sol trails too far in raw intelligence to win on price, and DevDay is OpenAI's last chance to keep subscribers.

The author tested several models on a network scanner dashboard task, found GPT-6 Luna MAX the only complete failure, and suspects GPT-6 Sol is a regression from 5.6 Sol.

The poster retracts their criticism of GPT-6 Sol, saying every GPT model except Astra has degraded, with Excel tasks that 5.6 Sol High once one-shotted now taking three or four iterations.

A post asks readers to pick one side for coding right now, Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol, with no fence-sitting allowed.

A developer says GPT-6 Sol makes frequent mistakes in domain modeling, data discovery and software architecture that GPT-5.6 Sol did not, citing the model's own line about starting at the top of the code listing.

The post says GPT-5.6 Sol ranks #19 on Text Arena while GPT-6 Sol drops to #60, calling it a regression for everyday conversation despite being cheaper and stronger at coding and agentic work.

A user who bought Codex Plus to compare GPT-6 Sol with Astra says the 5-hour limit ran out in 10–15 minutes without finishing one prompt, and threatens to cancel.

A video creator says GPT-6 Sol and Luna perform poorly and Astra is expensive and not much smarter, while a $20 Claude subscription rebuilt his video framework into something better.

This user says GPT-6 Sol handles hard problems with less reasoning than 5.6 needed and grinds away steadily, possibly thanks to its pragmatic, robot-like personality.