GPT-6 Sol leaks, screenshots and release rumors

The post says GPT-6 Sol costs 80% less than GPT-6 Astra and Opus 5.5 costs 60% less than Fable 5.1, concluding that frontier-level models no longer carry frontier-level prices.

A short take arguing that Sol and Astra serve different roles rather than Sol being a straight upgrade over Astra.

A comparison post lists Anthropic's and OpenAI's dense model releases this year and asks where Google has been since Gemini 3.1 Pro.

A reply argues that placing GPT-6 Sol and Fable 5.1 in the same pricing tier is criminal.

A short reply says that at the same tier, the poster thinks Fable 5.1 is better than GPT-6 Sol.

The author ran the same prompt through Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol, reporting Opus took 12.7 minutes and $2.86 while Sol took 11.4 minutes and $1.09, with a clear gap in results.

DHH posted Rails agent eval results saying OpenAI still holds a solid lead, with Luna Max close behind GPT-6 Sol at 18% completion and $11 cost.

A post complaining that keeping up with AI releases is a full-time job, noting GPT-6 Sol and Luna and Opus 5.5 all dropped the same day, with Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 said to be next.

The poster says OpenAI messed up GPT-6 Sol, praising Opus 5.5 for a fixed tone, better intelligence and usage limits that barely dropped after hours of use, unlike Astra.

A post claims GPT-6 Luna returns the same output as 5.6 Luna and GPT-6 Sol is only slightly better than 5.6 Sol, with both being cheaper and faster.

A joke post: GPT-6 Sol and Opus 5.5 just came out, so you can now build your SaaS 5x faster and still make $0 from it.

An image post claims GPT-6 Sol is a total killer of Grok 4.7, a rumored head-to-head take on the two models.