Opus 5.5 安全过滤致 CyberGym 得分仅 0.8%，DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 达 22.9%
用户批评 Anthropic 安全过滤：Opus 5.5 在 CyberGym 上 98% 任务被拦截、仅得 0.8%，开源 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1070 得 22.9%；CyberBench 上 55% vs 74%。
I love anthropic models and i'd rather use them for everything. that's exactly why this pisses me off that order never covered opus 5.5. which is what I tried to use, it was fable 5 and mythos 5, it got lifted in june, and opus 5.5 shipped in september I just looked this up to make sure I wasn't talking out of my ass: on artificial analysis cybergym, opus 5.5 scores 0.8% because roughly 98% of its tasks get blocked. free open-weight deepseek v4.1 flash 1070 scores 22.9%. on cyberbench, where refusals are failures, standard opus 5.5 gets 55% vs deepseek 74% your own system card calls the filters a "temporarily wider safety margin." that's your choice at this point, not the law