WHAT NEW IN X10.31 SAT

X 上的 AI 合集档案 · 22 个合集 · 62,909 条

deepseek-v4.1IMAGE

V4.1 Flash 跑分与价格汇总:编程超 Opus 5,HLE 仍落后

DeepSWE v1.1 得 77.0 高于 Opus 5 的 74.0,Terminal-Bench 4.0 从 31.2 升到 42.3,API 闲时输入 0.15 美元/百万 token,MIT 权重已上 Hugging Face,但 HLE 42.6 仍低于 Opus 5 的 56.3。

Master the captain
@mollicksoif912 天前收录原推发布于 2026.10.18
V4.1 Flash 跑分与价格汇总:编程超 Opus 5,HLE 仍落后
Master the captain @mollicksoif9原推发布于 2026.10.18
在 X 上打开原推

⚡ DeepSeek drops V4.1-Flash-1017 — beats Claude Opus 5 on coding at 1/10th the cost DeepSeek's latest Flash update scores higher on coding benchmarks than Claude Opus 5 — at ~$0.20 per task vs $2–$10 for rivals. Weights are free on Hugging Face under MIT. KEY POINTS • DeepSWE v1.1: 77.0 vs 74.0 for Claude Opus 5; Terminal-Bench 4.0 jumps 31.2 → 42.3 • API price: $0.15/M input tokens off-peak — the per-task cost math checks out • MIT-licensed weights on Hugging Face — run it anywhere, verify every claim • DeepSeek also opened Search & Fetch APIs ($0.75/1,000 calls), free via agent tools till Nov 1 WHY IT MATTERS Agentic coding keeps getting dramatically cheaper every few months — and open weights mean anyone can reproduce the scores instead of trusting a vendor scorecard. WHAT TO WATCH All benchmarks are DeepSeek's own — independent reproduction is still pending. Raw reasoning still trails Opus 5 (HLE 42.6 vs 56.3). Watch Artificial Analysis for the real verdict. #DeepSeek #OpenWeights

x.com/mollicksoif9/status/2111732130556649929采集于 2026.10.18 17:42